← All Reports

Trump Says Deal Is Near. Iran Calls It Fake News.

The fourth week of the US-Iran war opened Monday with a whiplash of contradictions: President Donald Trump claiming secret diplomacy was close to ending the conflict, Tehran flatly calling it fiction, markets swinging violently on every word, and a new five-day clock quietly ticking down on a threatened strike against Iranian power plants.

The war that began Feb. 28 with US and Israeli strikes killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has now killed more than 2,000 people, shuttered the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping, pushed Brent crude briefly above $120 per barrel, and drawn in Turkey, Egypt, and a roster of regional mediators scrambling to prevent a wider catastrophe.

On Monday morning, before US markets opened, Trump posted on social media that he was holding off plans to bomb Iranian power plants - an ultimatum he had issued over the weekend with a 48-hour deadline - because "very good" talks had taken place over the previous two days with unnamed "respected" Iranian officials. His envoys, son-in-law Jared Kushner and special representative Steve Witkoff, were said to be involved in those discussions.

Iran's parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf responded within hours on X: "No negotiations have been held with the US. Fakenews is used to manipulate the financial and oil markets."

The contradiction landed in the middle of a global energy market already stretched to its limits. Every word out of Washington or Tehran has moved oil prices by double digits in recent days. Brent crude dropped 10.9% on Monday to $99.94 per barrel, down from nearly $120 the previous week. The S&P 500 climbed 1.1%, its best session since the war began, but gave back gains in after-hours trading as Iran's denial sank in.

The Hormuz Ultimatum - Extended, Not Lifted

Over the weekend, Trump threatened to "obliterate" Iran's power plants unless Tehran reopened the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours. The strait - the narrow chokepoint off Iran's coast connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman - carries roughly one-fifth of all globally traded crude oil. Since the war began, Iran has used its geographic position there to strangle tanker traffic, sending fuel prices surging on every continent and rattling energy markets from Tokyo to London.

Monday's five-day extension was "subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions," Trump said - which means it is not a retraction, not a withdrawal, and not a capitulation. The ultimatum remains. The deadline moved. The gun is still pointed at Iran's electrical grid, and the threat to desalination plants that provide drinking water to millions of people across Gulf states has not been walked back by either side.

"All I'm saying is we are in the throes of a real possibility of making a deal. I think, if I were a betting man I'd bet for it. But again, I'm not guaranteeing anything." - President Donald Trump, Monday, before boarding Air Force One at Palm Beach International Airport

Iran's foreign ministry said Trump's statement was nothing more than an effort "to reduce energy prices and to buy time for implementing his military plans." The dual interpretation - Trump as sincere dealmaker versus Trump as calculated market manipulator - is exactly the ambiguity that has whipsawed traders for four weeks and made straightforward risk analysis nearly impossible.

Iran's semiofficial Fars and Tasnim news agencies portrayed the American president as backing down. That framing plays domestically inside Iran, where the new regime of Mojtaba Khamenei needs to project resolve after the catastrophic loss of the elder Supreme Leader and much of the country's senior political leadership in the opening strikes of the war.

What the War Has - and Has Not - Accomplished

Four weeks in, the strategic ledger is mixed at best. The US and Israel have killed Khamenei and a significant slice of Iran's senior leadership. Ali Larijani, secretary of the Supreme National Security Council and one of the most powerful political figures in the country, was also killed. A roster of other top-ranking military commanders and intelligence chiefs have been eliminated in the strike campaign, according to AP reporting.

But Trump's publicly stated objectives are far from completed. He has listed them in detail: degrade Iran's missile capability, destroy its defense industrial base, eliminate the Iranian navy, prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. On all five counts, the work is unfinished. Iranian missiles continued striking Israeli territory over the weekend. Saudi Arabia downed 20 Iranian drones targeting its eastern oil-producing region in just a few hours on Friday night. The Strait remains choked.

"Trump's war choice has not accomplished his military goals. Iran is still able to attack Gulf allies and effectively control the Strait of Hormuz. No nukes; no enrichment, good luck with that. A singularly incompetent use of America's power." - Aaron David Miller, former State Department Mideast negotiator, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

An Iranian ballistic missile fragment landed in a schoolyard in the Israeli settlement of Peduel in the West Bank on Monday, according to AP photographs. No casualties were reported, but the incident illustrates that Iran's capacity to strike Israeli-controlled territory has not been eliminated despite weeks of US and Israeli strikes on its missile infrastructure.

The US, meanwhile, is still sending more firepower into the region. Three additional amphibious assault ships carrying roughly 2,500 Marines were ordered to the Middle East last week, adding to vessels already repositioned there since the conflict began. The administration simultaneously requested another $200 billion from Congress to fund the war effort. Winding down a conflict while actively escalating military deployment is the defining contradiction of week four.

The Nuclear Question Nobody Can Answer

At the center of any potential deal sits the hardest problem: Iran's enriched uranium. Right now, no one - not the US, not the IAEA, not even Iran's neighbors - knows exactly where it is or how much of it is still intact.

As of June 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency estimated Iran held 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60% purity. That is a short technical step away from weapons-grade 90% enrichment. Princeton University professor Robert Goldston, who researches arms control and fusion energy, told AP that Iran had already performed 99% of the centrifuge work required to produce weapons-grade material for up to nine nuclear bombs.

Iran clouded that picture further in a February letter to the IAEA, declaring that normal safeguards inspections were "legally untenable and materially impracticable" following US and Israeli strikes on its nuclear facilities. Blocked from its usual monitoring sites, the agency turned to commercial satellite imagery to check on the situation. What investigators found was unsettling: "regular vehicular activity" around tunnel entrances at the Isfahan enrichment facility - which was bombed by both Israel and the US during the June 2025 war. What was moved from those tunnels, and where it went, remains completely unknown.

"The IAEA cannot verify whether Iran has suspended all enrichment-related activities, or the size of Iran's uranium stockpile at the affected nuclear facilities." - IAEA confidential report circulated to member states, March 2026

Trump said Monday that any deal would include the US taking possession of Iran's enriched uranium. "We will take it ourselves," he said, offering no operational details on how a military seizure of fissile material from underground facilities in a country at war would actually work. Iran has historically refused to surrender its enrichment program, insisting it has the right to develop nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. The gap between Trump's demand and what Tehran has ever agreed to across decades of negotiations is not a negotiating gap - it is a structural gulf.

Three rounds of talks in Geneva this year, mediated by Oman, have already ended without a deal. IAEA director general Rafael Grossi attended two of those sessions in February, according to an IAEA report, providing technical advice on verification. That the agency's top official is in the room signals how seriously the nuclear dimension is being treated. But the talks have produced nothing binding, and Iran has not restored inspector access to its bombed facilities.

Who Is Actually Running Iran Right Now?

Any deal requires a counterpart. The question of who can actually sign for Tehran is genuinely open - and this is not rhetorical ambiguity. It is a serious intelligence gap.

After Ali Khamenei was killed on Feb. 28, his 56-year-old son Mojtaba was rapidly named the new Supreme Leader by Iran's Assembly of Experts. He has not appeared in public since. US and Israeli officials have suggested he may have been wounded in the same Israeli strike that killed his father and his wife, Zahra Haddad Adel. Prime Minister Netanyahu said Thursday he cannot confirm Mojtaba's location or condition: "Have you seen him? We haven't, and we can't vouch for what exactly is happening there."

The power vacuum has pushed real authority toward Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. "The Revolutionary Guard is the state now," Ali Vaez, Iran project director at the International Crisis Group, told AP. The IRGC rose from Iran's 1979 revolution as a force explicitly designed to protect the clerical government. It now controls an enormous economic empire inside Iran - operating companies, banks, construction projects, and import networks worth hundreds of billions of dollars - and commands its own military and intelligence apparatus that operates in parallel to the regular armed forces.

Before the war, civilian political leadership was "subservient entirely" to the Supreme Leader, Vaez explained. With the elder Khamenei gone and his son's authority untested and potentially physically compromised, "it is really the Revolutionary Guards who are running the country." Negotiating with the IRGC is a fundamentally different proposition from negotiating with a civilian government. The Guard has spent 47 years building its power on the back of Iran's nuclear program and its regional proxy network. It has no institutional interest in surrendering either.

"Leadership matters, and the loss of key decision-makers spanning politics, intelligence, internal security and the army will have transformative consequences. The fixation on the terminology of 'regime collapse' is obscuring the fact that the regime is already changing." - Burcu Ozcelik, senior research fellow, Royal United Services Institute

Ozcelik's broader point is that Iran's political transformation, already underway before the war, has been accelerated by the strikes. But transformation does not mean collapse. The regime is adapting around its losses, delegating authority downward within the IRGC structure, and projecting enough operational capacity to keep Hormuz shut and Iranian missiles flying. It is wounded. It is not dead.

Regional Powers Attempt to Bridge the Gap

One potentially genuine signal came from a different direction on Monday. Turkey and Egypt both announced they had spoken separately to the warring parties - the first sign of coordinated mediation from regional heavyweights with credibility on both sides of the conflict.

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan spoke by phone with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Turkey's foreign ministry declined to comment on whether it had relayed messages between Tehran and Washington, but Fidan had spent the previous weekend in an intensive diplomatic sprint - in contact with counterparts from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Egypt, and the European Union, as well as US officials. That constellation of contacts represents a serious mediation architecture, not a single phone call.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer offered the most carefully calibrated outside confirmation. When asked about Trump's claims of talks, Starmer said: "We, the UK, were aware that was happening." He did not provide details or confirm substance. That is the kind of measured, deniable confirmation that a former barrister turned politician offers when something real is occurring but is too fragile to acknowledge directly without risking its collapse.

The Omani mediation channel that hosted three rounds of Geneva talks remains active. Oman has served as the back channel between Washington and Tehran for decades, maintaining relationships with both governments through multiple cycles of sanctions, confrontation, and brief thaw. Whether the current round of contacts goes through Muscat, through Ankara, or directly through back channels involving Kushner and Witkoff is not publicly known. The existence of multiple channels simultaneously is itself a signal that both sides are at least exploring the possibility of stopping the war.

Timeline: 26 Days That Shook the Middle East

The Five-Day Window: What a Deal Would Actually Require

Even if talks are genuine, the structural gap between what Trump is demanding and what Iran has ever agreed to is not a negotiating gap. It is a fundamental conflict over what the Islamic Republic is allowed to be.

Trump's conditions for ending the war are publicly stated: Iran surrenders its enriched uranium, suspends all enrichment, eliminates its ballistic missile capability, and reopens Hormuz permanently under international monitoring. These are not the terms of a peace negotiation. They are the terms of a surrender - a demand that Iran dismantle the strategic deterrents it spent four decades and hundreds of billions of dollars building, while getting no security guarantees in return and living next door to a nuclear-armed Israel.

Iran's negotiating floor, historically, is the 2015 JCPOA framework: limited enrichment at low purity, intrusive inspection regime, sanctions relief. Even that deal - which Iran signed under President Hassan Rouhani and which the Obama administration negotiated over years - was shredded by Trump in his first term in 2018. Why Iran's IRGC-dominated leadership in 2026 would agree to terms more onerous than those it spent years negotiating and then watched Washington abandon unilaterally is a question none of the deal optimists have answered.

Goldston's point about centrifuge work amplifies the problem: Iran has done 99% of the technical work needed to produce weapons-grade material for up to nine bombs. Even if it handed over all known enriched uranium, the knowledge, the engineers, and the centrifuge infrastructure remain. Any deal that does not permanently and verifiably dismantle Iran's entire enrichment capability is not the nuclear deal Trump is describing to reporters. It is a temporary pause that buys time while both sides regroup.

The US knows this. The IAEA knows this. Iran certainly knows this. And yet the talks continue - or do not continue, depending on which government you ask. The ambiguity itself may be the functional outcome both sides need right now. Trump gets a market-moving announcement that provides political breathing room domestically. Iran avoids a strike on its power grid that would cause mass civilian suffering. Both can claim they never compromised. The war continues at reduced tempo while someone in Muscat or Ankara works on whether a face-saving formula exists that covers all of this over with enough diplomatic language that nobody has to publicly retreat.

The five-day clock expires roughly Friday, Washington time. If no deal materializes, Trump faces his hardest choice of the war: follow through on striking Iran's power infrastructure - risking a catastrophic humanitarian crisis and likely Iranian counter-strikes on Gulf energy and desalination facilities - or extend the deadline a second time, visibly backing down in front of the entire world.

Sources: AP News (March 23-24, 2026); IAEA confidential member states report (March 2026); Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; International Crisis Group; Royal United Services Institute (RUSI); Princeton University Arms Control research; TVA Nouvelles.