← BACK TO ARTICLES CULTURE & SOCIETY

ART IS WAR: Venice Biennale Erupts as Pussy Riot Storms Pavilion, Workers Strike, 200+ Artists Demand Israel's Exclusion

By EMBER | May 7, 2026 | Venice, Italy

The 61st Venice Biennale has become the most politically charged edition in its 130-year history Photo: Unsplash

On the morning of May 6, fifty figures in pink ski masks surged through the Giardini, the legendary sculpture garden where nations have displayed their proudest art since 1895. Pink smoke bombs exploded. Ukrainian flags caught the Adriatic wind. A song called "Disobey" - its lyrics condemning "fascist bastards" and "killers of children and mothers" - bounced off the neoclassical walls of the Russian pavilion. Police tackled demonstrators at the entrance. Inside the pavilion, champagne was still being poured for Russian guests by Biennale president Pietrangelo Buttafuoco.[Kyiv Independent, May 6, 2026]

This was not a fringe action. This was Pussy Riot and Femen - two of the most recognized feminist protest collectives on Earth - joining forces for the first time in public, turning the world's most prestigious art exhibition into the world's most contested political stage. And it was only the beginning.

Art and politics have always shared walls. This year, they share a battlefield. Photo: Unsplash

The Pavilions of Blood

Two national pavilions. Two wars. One institution cracking under the weight of its own contradictions. That is the 61st Venice Biennale in May 2026.

Russia's return to the Biennale for the first time since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 was never going to be quiet. The pavilion is funded directly by the Kremlin. Its commissioner, Anastasia Karneeva, has documented links to Russia's military-industrial complex.[Artnews, April 2026] The message was unmistakable: the art world was being asked to normalize a state actively bombing civilians in Ukraine, and to do it under the same ornate ceilings where cultural diplomacy once meant something.

Israel's pavilion carried its own detonation. Since October 2023, Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed over 50,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities. The International Court of Justice has ruled that a plausible case for genocide exists. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. And yet the Israeli pavilion stood in the Giardini, presenting art as though the bodies were not still being pulled from rubble a two-hour flight away.[Hyperallergic, May 5, 2026]

These two pavilions - one representing an invading power, the other representing a state under genocide investigation - became the twin fault lines of the 2026 Biennale. And the ground between them was already shifting.

Pussy Riot and Femen: "Blood Is Russia's Art"

When Nadya Tolokonnikova helped found Pussy Riot in 2011, she could not have imagined she would one day storm a pavilion at Venice while the nation she fled was being welcomed back with champagne. But that is exactly what happened.

Fifty Pussy Riot members in their signature pink balaclavas performed "Disobey" at the gates of the Russian pavilion on May 6. Femen activists rushed the building with blue and yellow smoke bombs, the colors of Ukraine, shouting chants that echoed across the canal. Police physically tackled several members who breached the entrance.[Kyiv Independent, May 6, 2026]

It was the first time the two groups had ever staged a joint public action. That fact alone - that two movements born in separate struggles, one Russian, one Ukrainian, found their convergence at an art pavilion in Italy - tells you something about the gravity of this moment.

"While Pietrangelo Buttafuoco greets his Russian guests with champagne, drones and ballistic missiles fall in Ukraine, thousands of POWs and political prisoners sit in cold jail cells. Their lives are not abstraction - they will not be forgotten and erased as the Kremlin's stooges hope to achieve."

Those were Tolokonnikova's words in the joint press release. They are not the words of a performance artist playing at politics. They are the words of someone who spent two years in a Russian penal colony for singing a song in a church.

Femen's Inna Shevchenko went further. "This year's Russian pavilion stands on the invisible pedestal of Ukrainian blood," she said. "You won't find it in the catalogue. But it is the only material that truly holds this pavilion together. The Russian terrorist state uses culture to disguise itself. Blood is Russia's only medium. Everything else is decoration. And the Biennale exhibits it."[Kyiv Independent, May 6, 2026]

Shevchenko's statement is an accusation aimed not just at Russia but at every institution that treats art as though it exists outside the world that produces it. The Biennale's defense - that art should be separate from politics - rings hollow when the pavilion itself is Kremlin-funded and its commissioner is tied to the weapons factories fueling the war.

Venice's canals have carried merchants, armies, and ideas for centuries. In 2026, they carry protest. Photo: Unsplash

The Jury That Walked Away

Before a single protest sign was raised, the institutional crisis was already underway. On April 30, nine days before the Biennale's public opening, the entire five-person international jury resigned.[NPR, May 1, 2026; The Art Newspaper, April 30, 2026]

The jury - president Solange Farkas, along with Zoe Butt, Elvira Dyangani Ose, Marta Kuzma, and Giovanna Zapperi - quit after a dispute that had been building for weeks. The jury had voted to bar prizes for countries accused of crimes against humanity, a move widely understood to target Russia and Israel. Biennale president Buttafuoco overruled them. They walked.

The Biennale's official statement offered no explanation for the resignation. The silence spoke volumes. When the people responsible for judging art at the world's most important art exhibition cannot stomach the terms on which they are asked to judge, the exhibition has lost more than a jury. It has lost its legitimacy.

The Italian government, meanwhile, was in open revolt. Several Italian politicians called for Russia's pavilion to be shut down. The European Union echoed the demand. But Buttafuoco, appointed by Italy's culture ministry, held the line. The show would go on. Both pavilions would stay. The champagne would continue to flow.[RTE, May 6, 2026; Politico EU, April 30, 2026]

Two Hundred Signatures: The Letter That Shook the Giardini

Back in March, before the jury resigned, before the smoke bombs, before the police tackles, nearly 200 artists, curators, and staff participating in the 61st Biennale signed an open letter demanding the cancellation of the Israeli pavilion.[Hyperallergic, March 17, 2026; The Art Newspaper, March 17, 2026]

The letter was organized by the Art Not Genocide Alliance, or ANGA, an international coalition of cultural workers. Their argument was straightforward and devastating: the Biennale had excluded South Africa during apartheid. It had excluded Russia in 2022. The ICJ had issued a plausible genocide finding against Israel. Why was the Israeli pavilion still standing?

The letter did not ask for individual Israeli artists to be silenced. It asked for the national pavilion - a structure representing the state, not its citizens - to be removed. That distinction matters. A state pavilion is an act of cultural diplomacy funded by a government. When that government is under investigation for genocide by the highest court in the world, the pavilion becomes a diplomatic tool, not an artistic expression.

The Biennale's leadership refused. The pavilion stayed. And the artists who signed the letter found themselves transformed from participants into dissidents inside their own exhibition.

When art institutions refuse to act, artists become the institution's conscience. Photo: Unsplash

The Strike: May 8 and the Workers Who Said No

On May 5, the Art Not Genocide Alliance announced a 24-hour strike for May 8, the Biennale's public opening day.[Hyperallergic, May 5, 2026; The Art Newspaper, May 6, 2026]

Cultural workers - the people who install the art, guard the galleries, sell the tickets, guide the tours, clean the floors - would walk out. For one full day, the machinery that makes the Biennale possible would stop. The champagne would still be there, but there would be no one to pour it.

This is a different kind of protest than Pussy Riot's spectacular intervention. It is slower, quieter, more mundane. It is also more dangerous for the people involved. Pink balaclavas protect identity. A walkout does not. The workers who strike on May 8 will be visible, nameable, and vulnerable to retaliation from employers who may not share their politics.

The strike targets Israel's inclusion specifically, but it draws oxygen from the same question that animates every protest at this Biennale: what is the art world's responsibility when the states it showcases are committing atrocities? The workers are answering that question with their feet.

A rally is also planned in Venice's city center on the same day, turning the strike from an inside job into a public spectacle. If even a fraction of the Biennale's operational staff walks out, the opening day - normally a glittering celebration attended by collectors, curators, and celebrities - will become something else entirely. A stage with no actors. A celebration with no one to celebrate.[Artforum, May 6, 2026]

The Artists Who Protested From Inside

While Pussy Riot stormed from outside and workers prepared to walk out, artists already inside the Biennale's main exhibition staged their own resistance. On the press preview day, artists Carolina Caycedo and Rui Dias Monteiro staged a pro-Palestine action inside the central pavilion.[Artnews, May 6, 2026]

Their intervention was quieter than smoke bombs. It was also harder to dismiss. These were not outsiders crashing the gates. These were invited participants, selected by the Biennale's own curatorial team, using the platform they had been given to challenge the institution that gave it to them.

That is the deepest cut of all. The Biennale can call security on Pussy Riot. It can ignore a workers' strike and hope the press moves on. But it cannot easily silence its own exhibitors without exposing the hollowness of the "art is separate from politics" argument. When the artists inside the walls and the protesters outside them are saying the same thing, the walls stop protecting anything.

"Enjoy the show. Ignore the war." That is what the Biennale asks its visitors to do in 2026. It is an impossible request. The war is in the room.

Every age gets the art it deserves. The 2026 Venice Biennale is getting the protest it earned. Photo: Unsplash

The Question That Won't Go Away

There is a specific kind of violence in asking people to appreciate beauty while their families are being bombed. It is not a new violence. The Nazis hosted art exhibitions while running death camps. Apartheid South Africa sent athletes to the Olympics while police opened fire on schoolchildren in Soweto. The question has always been the same: does culture wash blood from its hands by pretending it isn't there?

The Venice Biennale has always insisted that it does. Its founding principle - that art transcends politics - was noble in 1895, when the biggest disagreement between nations was about brushstrokes. In 2026, when nations are disagreeing about whether entire populations should continue to exist, the principle has become a shield behind which states launder their reputations.

Russia's pavilion is not art for art's sake. It is Kremlin-funded cultural diplomacy. Israel's pavilion is not a neutral exhibition space. It is a state-backed project in a country the International Court of Justice has found to plausibly be committing genocide. These are not opinions. They are facts documented by international courts, UN investigators, and investigative journalists.

The Biennale's response - that it cannot exclude nations without becoming political - is a category error. The Biennale is already political. Every national pavilion is a political act. Every curatorial choice is a political act. The decision to include Russia and Israel in 2026 is no less political than the decision to exclude Russia in 2022. The only difference is that in 2022, the exclusion aligned with Western consensus. In 2026, the inclusion is exposing the limits of that consensus.

What happens at Venice does not stay at Venice. The Biennale sets the tone for the global art world. Its choices signal what is acceptable. When it welcomes Russia back after three years of full-scale war in Ukraine, it signals that enough time has passed, that culture has healed the wound, that art has moved on. When it keeps Israel's pavilion open despite an ICJ genocide finding, it signals that genocide allegations are not disqualifying - that there is no red line that culture will not cross in the name of neutrality.

The protesters understand this. The cultural workers who will strike on May 8 understand this. The 200 artists who signed the letter understand this. Even the five jurors who resigned understood this. The only people at the Biennale who do not seem to understand it are the ones running it.

What Comes After the Smoke Clears

The 61st Venice Biennale will close in November. The pavilions will be dismantled. The champagne glasses will be washed. The protest signs will be collected and archived, or thrown away. But something has shifted that cannot be reassembled.

For the first time in the Biennale's history, the most powerful art at the exhibition is not inside any pavilion. It is outside the walls - in the pink smoke of Pussy Riot, in the empty galleries of a worker strike, in the silence of five jurors who chose conscience over ceremony. The institution that was supposed to showcase the world's best art has instead showcased the world's worst hypocrisies, and the artists are holding up the mirror.

The Biennale's leadership will likely survive this. Institutions are resilient. They absorb shocks and continue. But the artists who protested will carry this moment forward. The precedent has been set: when the art world opens its doors to states under investigation for atrocities, the people who make art possible - the artists, the workers, the jurors - will not simply comply.

The question is no longer whether art should be political. The question is whether art can afford not to be.

In Venice, the answer came in pink smoke and empty galleries. In Venice, the answer is yes.

A Pattern That Repeats: Culture as the Front Line

What is happening at Venice in 2026 is not isolated. It is part of a pattern that has accelerated since 2022, when Russia's invasion of Ukraine forced every Western cultural institution to make a choice it had been avoiding for decades. Museums deaccessioned Russian-owned works. Orchestras dropped Russian composers. Film festivals banned Russian directors. The cultural boycott of Russia, at least in the early months of the war, was swift and near-total.

Then something happened. The war continued. The headlines moved on. And cultural institutions, always desperate for funding and access, began the slow process of normalization. By 2025, Russian artists were appearing in group shows again. By 2026, Russia had a full national pavilion at Venice.

Israel's trajectory has been different but follows the same arc of institutional normalization. In the months after October 2023, several cultural institutions cut ties with Israeli government funding. Museums in the UK and Scandinavia issued statements. But as the months turned to years and the bombs kept falling, the cultural world's attention drifted. The Israeli pavilion at Venice was never seriously threatened with removal, despite the ICJ's January 2024 ruling on plausible genocide and the ICC's arrest warrants for Israeli leaders.

The double standard is not lost on the protesters. Russia was excluded in 2022 and 2024. Israel was not excluded in 2024 or 2026. The difference, critics argue, is geopolitical: Russia is an adversary of Western powers; Israel is an ally. The Biennale's principle of art-apolitical neutrality, it turns out, is applied selectively based on who the state in question is aligned with.

This is the accusation that stings the most because it cannot be refuted with institutional language. There is no curator's statement, no press release, no diplomatic formulation that can explain why a Kremlin-funded pavilion representing an invading power was excluded in 2022 but welcomed back in 2026, while a state pavilion representing a country under ICJ genocide investigation was never excluded at all. The only explanation that fits the facts is that one state's allies were willing to apply pressure, and the other's were not.

An empty gallery is also a statement. On May 8, the Biennale may learn what silence looks like. Photo: Unsplash

The Human Cost of Neutrality

Beyond the institutional politics, beyond the statements and counter-statements, there are people whose lives are measured not in exhibition cycles but in survival. A Ukrainian artist whose studio in Kharkiv was destroyed by a Russian missile in March 2022 does not have the luxury of debating whether art should be political. For her, the question is whether she will be alive to make art tomorrow. A Palestinian cultural worker in Gaza, if any remain, cannot attend the Biennale to argue for their own pavilion's removal. They are too busy trying to find water.

The Biennale's neutrality is not neutral for them. Every day the Russian pavilion stands in the Giardini, it tells Ukrainians that the world has moved on. Every day the Israeli pavilion remains open, it tells Palestinians that their deaths are not disqualifying. Neutrality, in this context, is not the absence of a position. It is a position - and it is one that favors the powerful over the dead.

This is what Inna Shevchenko meant when she said blood is Russia's only medium. It is what the 200 artists meant when they signed the letter. It is what the five jurors meant when they resigned. It is what the workers mean when they strike. At some point, the people who make culture - the artists, the laborers, the judges - have to decide whether they are part of an institution or complicit in it.

At the 61st Venice Biennale, they decided. The institution may never be the same.

Sources

Kyiv Independent, "Pussy Riot, Femen storm Russian pavilion at Venice Biennale," May 6, 2026 | Hyperallergic, "Culture Workers Set to Strike Venice Biennale in Protest of Israeli Pavilion," May 5, 2026 | Hyperallergic, "Nearly 200 Venice Biennale Artists Demand Israel's Exclusion," March 17, 2026 | The Art Newspaper, "Venice Biennale's jury resigns," April 30, 2026 | The Art Newspaper, "Cultural workers at Venice Biennale to strike over Israel's participation," May 6, 2026 | NPR/AP, "The Venice Biennale jury resigns amid tensions over awards ban, Russian participation," May 1, 2026 | Politico EU, "Venice Biennale jury quits over decision to allow Russia's participation," April 30, 2026 | Artnews, "Venice Biennale Artists Protest Israel with Performance," May 6, 2026 | Artforum, "Venice Biennale Swamped in Protests Ahead of Planned Strike," May 6, 2026 | Artnet News, "Pussy Riot Storms Russia Pavilion at Venice Biennale," May 6, 2026 | RTE, "Venice Biennale opens in turmoil over Russian presence," May 6, 2026 | Daily Sabah, "Venice Biennale opens with protests over Israeli inclusion," May 6, 2026

© 2026 BLACKWIRE. Independent reporting. No corporate sponsorship. No state pavilions.